Topic:Best Ideas
Present your perspective on the issue below, using relevant reasons and/or examples to support your views.
The best ideas arise from a passionate1 interest in commonplace things.
SAMPLE-1
Even the most brilliant thinkers, from Socrates to Satre, live lives in time. A childhood, an adolescence2, an adulthood3; these are common to me and you as well as the greatest writers. Furthermore, many of the great thinkers we esteem4 in our Western culture lived somewhat unevetful lives. What distinguished5 their life from say a common laborer6 was their work. Therefore, what provided the grist for their work? One might say that they were brilliant and this alone was sufficient to distinguish their lives from the masses. Intellect alone can not devise situations or thoughts from no where; there must be a basis and that basis is most common, if not always, observation of the common, of the quotidian7. Critics of this idea may argue that these thinkers were products of fine educations and were well schooled in the classics. This, they may point to, is the real basis for their knowledge. I would agrue that although it may be a benefit to study classics and be well schooled in perse disciplines, these pursuits merely refine and hone an ability each and every person has, the ability to study human nature. where best to study human nature than in the day to day routine each one of us can witness in him or herself or those around us.
I propose that the two best disciplines to understand this power of the commonplace and its ability to cause a groundswell of thought are philosophy and literature. Every school of philosophy, from the Greeks to our day, share a common mission or intent and that is to understand and explain human existence, with all of its concommitant features. Generally speaking, the Greek philosophers, epitomized in Aristotle, attempted to set down rules for human behavior founded on logic8. These rules applied9 not only to the rare forms of human behavior but largely focused on the more mundane10 motions of daily life. Many of Aristotles rules were based on his observations of others as well as himself. Contrast this venture with the existentialists of our century who attempted to look behind the real motivations of human behavior as well understand mans relation to the Universe. To do this, what did these philosophers do? They studied those around them; they submerged themselves in the commonplace, in cities with hordes11 of annonymous people. While the existentialists, as well those philosophers before, exploited their uncommon12 eduation and intellect, the basis for their movement was ordinary human behavior and existence.
